What do you think this quote means?

Aldous Huxley said "the end cannot justify the means for the simple and obvious reason that the means employed determine the nature of the ends produced." This was quoted in his essay Ends and Means (1937)--an essay about human behavior and why we cannot agree on how to achieve "liberty, peace, justice, and brotherly love," and therefore cannot achieve it.I can't say that I fully understand it because I think to understand something I should also be able to explain it, but I can't. Can someone please help me put it in simpler terms so that I can understand it better?It makes sense in the context that it was written. We want an ultimate good end, but how can we get it if we don't do good things to get to that end?.. But I wonder how I can put it in a less severe context, something applicable to daily life. Examples would be lovely if someone can come up with one. Thanks!

Similar Asks:

  • What is a reaccuring theme of the Odyssey? - I read the book but didn’t fully understand it, and now I have to write an essay on it.I just need a few ideas and examples to get me started and I’ll be good to go. Thanks!
  • Sociology essay- I don’t understand the question? - I have an essay for my Sociology homework (A-level), however I don’t understand the question as a whole. I understand what they key words mean, but when put together it doesn’t really make sense.Asses the view that processes in the home are mainly responsible for class difference in attainment (20 marks)I understand that is it
  • Essay review?I needed to write an essay does it sound good? - My career goals at the moment are to get certified as an LPN. Start working as an LPN in a hospital or clinic. Get establish and settled and maybe go back to college and get the required credentials to become and RN. For all of this you need to find good schools that will help
  • PLEASE ANSWER! Do you think movies could be use to present a social problem and a possible solution? - For an essay I must do, I need to explain if I think that movies could be made with the purpose of helping the society understand social problems (alcoholism, suicide, assassinations, robbery, poverty) and to present some possible solutions.Even though many of the actors that are presented in the movie may know nothing of the
  • What is context in essay writing? - I’m currently studying a novel in class and I have an in-class essay coming up for it. The question is unseen, but the teacher recommended we mark pages in regards to ‘context’.I don’t fully understand what this is though, so could anyone clarify this for me please?Thank-you
  • What is the mutability of phenomena? - I want help with a clear definition of this phrase means. Here is the whole of my essay question just to give context -’For Svankmajer anything may come to life at any moment’ (Richardson) Discuss the mutability of phenomena and the secret life of objects in the work of Svankmajer.’Mutability I understand to be the
  • Is this a good essay? - Helping families is my true passion since I can remember.Working at a Head Start has changed some of my thoughts to help better those families.what made me choose this field was my own children and what I have over come,is partly why i want to help children and their families.Helping families with parenting skills is

3 Responses to “What do you think this quote means?”

  1. dasyuroid says:

    The question is, do the results make the methods OK?Example, is it OK to torture someone?Another question might be, ‘Why are they being tortured?’If the answer is, ‘For the torturer’s fun,’ then the results (ends) would not justify the means (make the methods OK).If the answer is, ‘To save the lives of 10 people,’ then the results (ends) could justify the means (methods).Huxley is actually making a point that an action’s justification (whether doing something is OK or not) can’t be determined by the outcome/results of that action, no matter how good or bad. Also, he is saying that the actions produce the results, the results don’t produce the actions.Example, torture is never OK.He goes on to make the point that since we can’t agree on the quality (good or bad) of an outcome, we can’t then agree on a way to achieve it.Example, if all the terrorists were found and killed in a single instant, the world would be at peace, but not everyone would be happy with that, as terrorists have families and loved ones. These people would not agree on the means or the ends.Hope this helps.

  2. piston's says:

    He’s just basically saying we must do better.If we just focus on the end goal without caring about how we get there…

  3. canonicalized says:

    Gaining something through violence or trickery means that the potential for those actions would always exist, even if the desired ends were “peace,” or “brotherly love.” Peace begets peace. Love begets love.